Ortendahl and Högstedt
The unnatural presence of microwaves in urban centers throughout the world is a criminal practice of Medicine endorsed by the World Health Organization and intended to benefit private companies in the United States and Europe.
Apart from the fact that no MEDICAL STUDIES were conducted by any government in the world, the WHO or any company in order to introduce cell phone telephony and its derivatives, the total evidence against an environmental use of microwaves is in excess of several million medical references dating back to the 19th century.
Amongst these crimes that were cooked by Michael Repacholi, the dental amalgam issue is preeminent in regards to the scientific fraud needed to introduce cell phone telephony.
Ortendahl and Högstedt have demonstrated how millions of human beings are slowly getting intoxicated through the deleterious action of microwaves on dental amalgams. This chronic intoxication has the potential of modifying the human genome of the human generations to come. Even bacteria seem to be affected.
The Histoly Department of Gothenburg University in Sweden has concluded: "Potentiostatic analyses were performed on amalgam samples exposed to AC and DC magnetic fields. Morphologic changes were analyzed using differential interference light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Chemical changes on the surface of the amalgam samples were analyzed with secondary ion mass spectrometry. Results demonstrated that dental amalgams exposed to a specific AC magnetic field underwent morphologic and chemical changes in the superficial amalgam layers".
Again, he who is guilty will remain in silence. No explanations will come from the World Health Organization. Guilt by association with the ICNIRP.
Dr. CARLOS SOSA, MD
--------
Re: Ortendahl and Högstedt
Take a careful look, and you'll see that the World Health Organisation's EMF Project sees as one of its goals -- "Facilitating public acceptance of microwave standards." (I think that's exactly how it's phrased.)
Now ask yourself -- what the h... does a so-called public health organisation have to do, with facilitating public acceptance of microwave technology? How can this possibly be part of their "mission"? I believe this is the smoking gun here. It is a dead giveaway.
That being said, having spoken in some length to the new director of the EMF Project, Emilie van Deventer, I honestly believe that she is not at all in the same camp as her predecessor Michael Repacholi, and I believe she has a much more open mind on all this. She told me in an aside -- "The cellphone companies aren't interested in your health. They're only interested in making sure that their networks operate". That was a very interesting thing to hear. Let's see. It's all becoming very interesting.
karlmuller30
--------
Re: Ortendahl and Högstedt
Beyond what Emilie Perkins van Deventer says, what is important in WORLD HEALTH is what she does. Emilie Perkins van Deventer is an Electrical Engineer. This is to say, she lacks both the Medical Expertise and the Academic Credentials in order to take concrete actions to protect the PHYSICAL INTEGRITY of millions throughout the planet. Emilie Perkins van Deventer lacks the capacity to send out an international epidemiological alert concerning the clinical injuries caused by EMF. Her critical immobility was granted from the root to favor the status quo.
Thanks to the prostitution, the decadence and the phariseeism inside the World Health Organization, we have replaced a criminal fraud by another one. Both Michael Repacholi and Emilie Perkins van Deventer lack the academic background in Medicine needed to work in such a position. And this is just part of the vested interests that the WHO defends. Cell phone economical interests cannot and will not be touched on medical grounds by the WHO.
The conduct of this type of WHO officials is responsible for the death and disease of millions in the world. Within this framework of structural and systematic falsehood, key positions inside the World Health Organization are occupied by people who cannot do anything at all to protect World Health. That is the whole issue. It is an intrinsic fraud which was thought with a complete evil intention. It's like placing a carpenter inside NASA in order to construct the next generation of rockets to Mars. This is done so that things don't get done.
In a movement that a few decades ago would be incredible, the policies of the World Health Organization are a warranty to cause death, suffering and disease in the five continents. There is no difference whatsoever between the Coca Cola company and the World Health Organization. I have the slight suspicion that the moral integrity of both Michael Repacholi and Emilie Perkins van Deventer does not add up to even half of the moral background of Pablo Escobar. Is the Cartel actually in Colombia or in Geneva?
Dr. Carlos Sosa, MD
--------
Re: Ortendahl and Högstedt
And on an interesting note, a PubMed search of "van Deventer E" returns only 10 papers, of which there is a very clear trend of papers regarding RF related EMF effects on the public. Most of these also share Repacholi as an author (excluding the '88 stuff which appears to be a different van Deventer), and presumably are after her appointment within the WHO "framework".
It doesn't appear that she has published any real science whatsoever out of her involvement within WHO, and that which she has since published are hardly qualification required science, nor is she a primary author of anything.
I am inclined to agree with Carlos here, regardless of how she may be different (or not, as the case may be) to Repacholi, what qualifies her to sit in her current role at WHO? How, may I ask, did she get appointed to the position? By whom, and on what criteria did she beat the competition to the place?
It would be interesting to see some justification from WHO.
Graham
--------
Re: Ortendahl and Högstedt
Carlos,
well put. Emilie Perkins van Deventer is an electrical engineer, which has nothing to do with health. I see there was a meeting at Geneva early this year with her and it looks as if Eileen O'Conner who is on this list has attended the meeting:
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/who_meeting_geneva_(2).doc
Perhaps Eileen can give some more insight?
It seems this was just another alibi disposition. Telling we take your concerns very serious, which in reality means, you'll be radiated at our wills, resistance is futile...;(
Concerning Pablo Escobar, one could at least say the dangers of drugs handled by this cartel are pretty well know. Those endorsed by WHO targeting far more people are told be safe, by lying about scientific evidence telling about the dagers, which are available since very long time.
Criminal energy by WHO seems to outweight those of Pablo Escobar in order of magnitudes. Though one injustice doesn't justify another, but I am sure this wasn't your point?
Tom
--------
Re: Ortendahl and Högstedt
I was at a two-day conference in Johannesburg, Oct 8/9, hosted by the SA Bureau of Standards and the Finnish govt radiation protection board, on mobile phones and health. This is where we met Emilie van Deventer.
After her presentation, I questioned her on adopting the precautionary principle -- why the WHO did not take this very basic step. Where there is evidence of particular risk, even if it has not been "proven", one takes precautions. Her very woolly reply was to the effect that we didn't know enough to know that we didn't know enough to adopt the principle. My heart really sank, and I thought, there truly is no hope here.
However, in speaking with her in private later, it became clear that she really is on a huge learning curve, and is not unsympathetic. The question as to why an engineer is put in a public health position is extremely relevant. The whole field has traditionally been dominated by physicists and engineers with no health background at all. This is actually a colossal indictment of the medical profession, which has completely abrogated its responsibilities, and left it to the engineers (while they prescribe Ritalin and anti-epileptic drugs etc for EMR-induced illnesses).
But this is ALL politics now. I think the most important thing is to have something approximating a human being in that position at WHO, who is actually willing to listen. I felt that this was the case with her. I went with a very hard and sceptical attitude, and left feeling that there was someone there who was in fact prepared to listen and learn.
What **completely** stunned me at this conference was the absolutely blind "science" that was presented. Without trying to exaggerate or blow my own trumpet, I drove large trucks through the gaping holes in most of the presentations. I was horrified that this stuff was actually rated as acceptable science. You can read some of the presentations here:
https://www.sabs.co.za/code/Presentations.html
to see what I'm talking about.
Just to give you one example, CK Chou, heap big man in the field and a Motorola consultant, gave this talk where he went to great pains to say that all the effects he had seen due to microwaves were just "thermal effects". He had done work on "microwave hearing", for example, with radar pulses which operators could hear, and he said this was "just" a "thermo-elastic effect". Implying that this was therefore nothing to worry about.
We have a number of people here who suffer chronically from microwave hearing from cellphone masts, so I wanted to query him about this. But first, I said, on a small point, I was not happy with this phrase "non-thermal effects". I said that any absorption of radiation is going to agitate or energise the atoms that do the absorbing, and they will "jiggle" more, and therefore their temperature will rise. The only reason you can ever call this "non-thermal", I told him, is that these effects are too small for you to measure, are too localised.
Yes, he said immediately, you are quite right, that is why we don't talk about "non-thermal" effects, we talk about "low-level" effects.
This was after the **entire** talk he had just given used the phrase "non-thermal" over and over and over again. Then he says, oh, we don't talk about "non-thermal" effects. It was an amazing flip- flop, carried out without missing a beat. I hope a couple of other people noticed.
At the end of the conference, a journalist said she was very confused by all the talk, and wanted to know, could an assurance be given that it was all right for pregnant women and small children to use cellphones. This CK Chou said, absolutely no problem, pregnant women and little children could use cellphones for extended periods, could talk for hours without any risk at all.
Now this is an academic talking who is also a Motorola consultant. I think these are the guys who should be nailed. I have said many times that people like Michael Repacholi should be charged in a world court with crimes against humanity. He knows exactly what he's doing, and what he gets paid for doing it. I told our National Prosecuting Authority in the course of a big submission (literally accusing the cellphone operators here of genocide, as defined under the 1948 Geneva Convention) that if Repacholi set foot in this country again on "business" -- he was here I think around 1993/94 for a conference - - I would make a citizen's arrest. The law here says that if you catch someone actually in the commission of a crime, you may arrest them, so if he speaks at a conference here, I will have no hesitation in making a direct intervention against this man.
The only voice of sanity among the scientists was Michael Kundi, who spoke on doing science based on a "precautionary approach" that was deliberately designed to detect real problems, rather than pretending that this was all "neutral" science. His colleague Franz Adlkofer (who didn't make a presentation) also made it clear that the DNA damage etc they discovered in the Reflex study was very real, but what he said was very diplomatically phrased and did not have a great overt impact. But I think Kundi is very smart and understands the issues very well. It's a difficult game at that level.
The other interesting contribution was Dariusz Leszczynksi of the Finnish government board, who presented direct mechanism whereby cancer etc could be caused, and gave evidence of direct tissue damage occurring at "non-thermal" levels (they irradiated people's arms with cellphones and studied the skin damage, using the other arm as a control).
It's a very real question as to how people like Emilie van Deventer are appointed, and why such an inexperienced person is put in such a vital position. But I still think she is capable of seeing which way the wind is blowing. The politics in Geneva must be hellishly complex, and one can't expect someone to turn everything upside-down overnight. We are putting together some information to send her (I'll post it here when we get it together). Let's see how she responds. I did get the feeling that she is a decent human being, and that counts for a lot in my book. I decided that I didn't want to launch a full- scale attack at the conference, which I was seriously planning to do. But we said plenty, never fear. We were told that never before had a scientific conference of this nature experienced such an intervention from "activists", and there were plenty scientists there who thought we were out of line. But the organisers were very happy with our participation, so I'm glad we kept it cool.
(However I did let loose one of our members, a very agitated individual who suffers terribly from microwave hearing and other problems, on both Van Deventer and CK Chou. He gave them a complete roasting which I'm sure neither of them will ever forget, before I eventually pulled him off.)
But if you just listen to what these guys are saying, on the face of it, it really seems possible that there is "no problem", and it becomes easier to understand why Van Deventer took the position that she did. There is a **really** big structural problem with our science and its connections to industry. However, I feel the tide is turning, and a colossal tsunami of information is going to burst on the world in the next few years, as a pandemic of health problems becomes evident. At that point, we'll see a lot of people suddenly flip-flop.
Very quickly written, I might add, but I think this is crucial stuff. Anyone who wants to nail Repacholi, please sign me up. I think that would be a PR coup, would really put the issue on the map.
karlmuller30
--------
Re: Ortendahl and Högstedt
Dear karlmuller30:
Thank you for the valuable link. I'm counting on you for this "nailing" you're writing about. That is in fact the way. I praise your keen insight.
The exposure of pregnant women to microwaves, be it from cell phones, cell phone masts, Wi-Fi, Wi-Max, radars or other microwaves sources is just another criminal endorsement committed by the World Health Organization to the imperial interests of international private companies. These studies concerning human pregnancy have not been done in any part of the world. Furthermore, THEY ARE IMMORAL AND CANNOT BE DONE. This is a clear violation of medical ethics, of the Nuremberg code, of the Helsinkin Declaration, of Human Rights, etc. You cannot expose a pregnant woman to the electromagnetic field of a mast to see what happens! I stand in horror with the total lack of decency of the director of the World Health Organization and of course of Emilie Perkins van Deventer. They have allowed this to happen and have the courage to state that these microwaves cause no harm. They don't seem to realize it but this is a terrible CATCH-22 situation for the WHO: not only they don't have the studies to prove the lack of harm to human pregnancy under cell phone microwaves, but also, they CANNOT conduct the studies pertinent to that purpose because that would be a clear violation of medical ethics and an approval of the moral apparatus put forth by Joseph Mengele in Auschwitz and Treblinka. Indeed! We have Nazis running the World Health Organization and nobody says a word!
In 1973 the WHO conducted an international congress in Warsaw, Poland that was sponsored by the US Department of Health, Education and Welfare and the polish government. The book, "Biologic Effects and Health Hazards of Microwave Radiation"- Proceedings of an International Symposium, Warsaw, 15-18, 1973, provides evidence of the teratogenic potential of microwaves. In one of the publications included in this book by the Division of Biological Effects, Bureau of Radiological Health of the FDA, in pages 102-104 there is clear photographic evidence of anencephaly (lack of brain development), resorptions, hematomas and exencephalies. Did Emilie Perkins read this book. Why or why not? And what did she do afterwards? Why hasn't she done a single thing? Did the WHO burn book from ist library?
Listening to all the complains of different world organizations is the least thing I would expect from the WHO.
The World Health Organization is not the place to learn! This is a place for international experts in MEDICINE. This is not the place to start a learning curve. Being a good person is totally irrelevant to the scientific fraud that Emilie Perkins is conducting. She does not have the knowledge to be in that position. She won't quit the job of course, because she's the first line of defense for the cell phone industry.
The Soviet Union developed quite an industry around microwaves and the medical profession there achieved some miracles that are still obscure to the World Health Organization. The medical injuries caused by microwaves were known by physicians of the Soviet Union.
I do have the hope that the new year will bring an international team that aims to capture Michael Repacholi and process him for crimes against mankind, just like it happened with Pablo Escobar. Those who conspire against the physical integrity of millions will sooner or later pay. I still have the vivid images of Newsweek reporting on the extermination of Anastasio Somoza with a bazooka in Paraguay. It's a matter of time (which we need to accelerate).
CARLOS SOSA