BUSTER in TN

The birds are not the only one that are dying and confused. A much more important species other than humans

are HONEY BEES... Bee colony collapse is is dangerously HIGH. Without bee pollenization of food crops,of which, 80%+is dependent on the honey bee pollenating........THINK ABOUT IT ......What do you like to eat????

zidek666, you have some valid points here. Dr Mercola makes valid points as well. I have worked in the wireless industry for some years. My son has training in the nuclear industry.

Blanket statements of overall bad effects in any area are usually wrong somewhere so it is good to see a qualified answer for usage of various radiowaves and their differences in intensity and direction.

I remember a Director at our company having to get a tumor removed from her ear canal, on her "cell phone ear".  The company for which I worked used the cell phone almost exclusively as our "walkie-talkies" during workhours which were night, day, and weekend. I didn't hear a lot of stories of brain tumors at our company. I can't think of any actually.

My husband is a techie-nut and we have all kinds of wires and wireless things in  use at the house, as well as a sophisticated home computer network. My ears ache after I use certain phones - and never the old analog wired ones. I do think the electro-magnetic fields affect me but its a non-specific feeling that I can't prove.

Has anyone felt the overhwhelming stillness of the house during a power outtage? The intensity of this sensation tells me that we do have too much of something here. I like to go camping in the middle of nowhere because of the great relief the experience affords from this frazzling effect.

I do know that a telecommunications company for which my husband worked has had brain tumor problems. The dispatch workers and others who spent the day in front of the old IBM monitors - this was in the mainframe days of the 80s -  have almost ALL died of brain tumors or cancer. I believe that these styles of  monitor were all known eventually  to be highly toxic. I shudder as I think about how I worked at one when I was a programmer during that same era.

a1kinobe, regarding how you keep from feeling depressed - I have this same issue, as do some of my friends, and one of the things I try to keep in mind is that humankind has been overcoming the effects of greed and immorality for thousands of years. It's something we probably just have to learn to live with, and continue to do our best to make positive changes. I know, that's small consolation, but there's really few options - either try to be happy and spread the positive things you learn, or be sad while trying to spread the positive things you learn. Happy people seem to get a bigger audience so I do my best to stay upbeat. I've been fighting against enviornmental destruction for well over 25 years so it takes some inner strength to keep that smile. At least here you have many like-minded people who are working for positive changes!

In October 2001 a Dr. Mueller of Germany demonstrated a new wireless technology to the world!

It does NOT require "cells" and is not only safer, but infinitely better. - It uses 'gravitational pressure waves' (GPW), which are standing waves with a frequency range of nano meters to lightyears, for carriers. He calls it: G- COM.

The technology is offered by him to ANYONE with only one provisor; no exclusivity at all! - This technology enables signals of a portable little phone to be transferred onto a GPW of the appropriate half wave length to the other party, which picks it up from there with "0" time lapse. This means, that not only does the signal penetrate the earth or (salt) water bodies, but does so without signal strength loss or time loss. A round trip signal to Mars, for example, would be instantaneous instead of taking 40 minutes! But, as predictable, nobody has figured out how to charge for the 'talk time'. -

In October 2001 a Dr. Mueller of Germany demonstrated a new wireless technology to the world!

It does NOT require "cells" and is not only safer, but infinitely better. - It uses 'gravitational pressure waves' (GPW), which are standing waves with a frequency range of nano meters to lightyears, for carriers.

The technology is offered by him to ANYONE with only one provisor; no exclusivity at all! - This technology enables signals of a portable little phone to be tranferred onto a GPW of the appropriate half wave length to the other party, which picks it up from there with "0" time lapse. This means, that not only does the signal penetrate the earth or (salt) water bodies, but does so without signal strength loss or time loss. A round trip signal to Mars, for example, would be instantaneous instead of taking 40 minutes! But, as predictable, nobody has figured out how to charge for the 'talk time'. -

I get so depressed when I read of these conspiracies, or not caring, by the major corporations that seem not to care about anything but the bottom line, and we all pay for it!  I worry about my son, and how he'll survive the increasing toxic assaults, as well as us.  People then say, "well you have to think positive" or " we can change the world, one person at a time" but that's too darn slow for me!  What do you all do, think or act in order to stay genuinely positive under these conditions?

I think this is a problem for bird, but I believe it's one of many.  Habitat destruction, pesticide usage (direct poisoning & killing of their food sources), cats (feral & house cats) & other invasive species (ie. starlings), climate change, mono-crop mega-agriculture.  The "canaries in the coal mine" are dying, but are we paying attention?

Thank you Dr Mercola for the awesome work you are doing with your website, I dont think cell phones are healthy for humans. The economic interests are so big in the cell phone industry so it will never be forbidden no matter what. The knowledge about the danger will be and have been suppressed, we can see what happened to Dr. Carlo when he start talking the truth.

The fact that migratory birds are being disoriented is certainly disturbing. And the fact that young children are being sent out with cell phones by their parents is also highly questionable, but far more dangerous is the fact that many pregnant mothers are still using electric blankets and/or electric waterbed heaters. These sources, along with increasingly rare high-radiation CRTs and electric cable heated walls are the most potent sources of harmful ELF radiation. What this means is that although cell phone use poses the greatest risk to children who use them regularly, they are far from being the greatest radiation risk in the environment. While it is important to inform the public about the ever increasing list of risky sources of radiation, it is even more important to reiterate the worst offenders, and the stages of growth at which they pose the greatest risk, which scales linearly from highest at fertilization to lowest at adulthood. Thank you for allowing me to post this important reminder.

I resisted getting a cell phone for years, until I finally relented a few years ago due to business concerns.  I instinctively know that they are not good; my ears literally burn and feel clogged after a long call.  I instinctively know that there is a cover up of some kind going on, and I believe that Dr. Mercola is probably correct in saying that this will be another Tobacco industry type of scandal in future, when many innocent folks are dying of cancers caused by these "harmless" devices.  Unfortunately, cell phone technology and WIFI is quite addicting, and like tobacco, many will continue to use even when they know the truth.  How convienient.  How typical.  I finally have a phone with a speaker function, and will try to use it as much as possible.  I am grateful for Dr.Mercola's website, which is FREE, scientifically based information to anyone with "ears to hear".

Rosamundie, FL

Is anyone familiar with a product called Q-Link?  I purchased one a few years back, but I don't have research based assurance that it provides protection against cell phone signal health damage.

My son tells me that the most vulnerable to radioactivity and electromagnetic fields are 'developing cells'. So children and young animals would be adversely affected by unrestricted waves of certain levels and intensities.

I have also suspected that sonar testing, per se, is not the all of the culprit in whale deaths. What happens on a Navy submarine is that the guys at the console get bored. These sailors find that by specifically directing sonar at a whale makes them cry out. What these poor guys probably don't realize is that they might be harming the whales and this is why the whales cry out.

The FCC is vulnerable to lobbyists just like any industry. My old company intensely lobbied the FCC like all the telecommunications companies do. So, in reality, "corporate interests" do affect the FCC. The FCC gets much of its information from these interests.

Thanks Dr Mercola for a thought-provoking article. I do believe that electro-magnetic usage is way out of control. Not knowing how this all affects me specifically is unsettling.

No need to rewire your home to avoid wireless. Just use powerline ethernet adapters. Anywhere that you have a plugin, you have an ethernet connection. I am allergic to wireless and have been using these for a while. They work great. I also cannot talk on a cell phone for more than 30 seconds without getting a headache and feeling nausiated. When I had a 2.4 ghz phone, same problem. I now have a 5.8ghz phones and have no problems.

Thank you for mentioning and promoting Dr. Carlo and his work. He has been the Lone Ranger on this issue for almost 10 years, and has been willing to risk everything to get the truth out. He needs to be heard!

zidek666 - I am glad someone (you) spoke up re the technical problems with Dr. Mercola's presentation. I will not try to add to what you said.. there is no need. It is correct. I am a retired electronics engineer with decades of experience in the electronics business and in amateur radio. I know what I am talking about, and so do you. Thanks again for clearing up this matter. I see you got tons of negative votes. They are coming from those who swallowed the propaganda on this subject, hook, line and sinker. I am a Dr. Mercola fan, but his stand on this whole subject has gotten terribly carried away.

Much as I respect and admire Dr. Mercola's many common sense insights, the assertion that all EM radiation and particularly cell phone, WIFI, and other extremely low level RF radiation is harmful to health is absolute rubbish and deceptive. Furthermore, the assertion that there is a corporate conspiracy to hide this dubious danger is equally ludicrous and disingenuous.

He recommends that we should get adequate sunshine and yet may not realize in that doing so exposes us to infrared, optical, ultraviolet, and other high energy electromagnetic radiations. Are these harmful because they are electromagnetic? Of course not unless they are at very intense levels. The same hold true for any EM radiation. It depends on the power level and intensity. Too much of anything is harmful.

Cell phones emit RF radiation in microwatts (millionth of a watt) not in many thousands of watts that could indeed cause biological damage.  Its about as much EM radiation as seeing a lone candle in large dark auditorium many hundreds of feet away. Yet the article would have you belive you're standing in the midst of a furnace!

The statement: <Researchers have now found that robins get disoriented when they’re exposed to a vertically aligned broadband of 0.1 to 10 MHz, or a single frequency of 7 MHz broadcast at a 24- or 48-degree angle to the natural geomagnetic field.>  is true if and only if the broadcast is in extremely high power levels. AM broadcast stations have transmitted on these frequencies with hundreds of thousands of watts 24/7 for decades and yet there have been no widespread reports that robins have become disoriented around high powered bradcast stations.

The assertion that all this is somehow a corporate conspiracy is equally puzzling from Dr. Mercola, an advocate of free markets and free enterprise. The reason that 2.4 Mhz was allocated to Wifi, cellular communications was not determined by the "corporate interests" but by the government's  FCC. Blame the US Gov.