Safety regarding growing and rogue techno-emissions into bodies, within private homes


This very thoughtful letter was recently submitted to the Auditor General of Canada, Environmental Petitions Manager. 








From: Marilyn Idle L.L.B.

Counsellor, Mediator

Wellness Advocate

April 15, 2008


To: Mr. Hiller, Petitions Manager for the Office of the Auditor General of Canada


Safety regarding growing and rogue techno-emissions into bodies, within private homes; public airways and buildings and waterways.


Dear Mr. Hiller,


This is an easy letter for me to write because I love technology and wireless technologies and I know they can be made much safer, as Europe is demonstrating for us.


Various and growing frequencies are now emitting through wireless and wired technologies 24/7 at an rapid and escalating rate daily. These multiple emissions, various rogue; and various inappropriate and conflicting frequency emission are harming over time, people's ability to preserve natural and healthy human functioning in neural, brain, blood, the blood-forming organs and within cellular processes. -Simply put, many too many technological frequency emissions are being received and "read" by our cells, without appropriate safety measures in place. These emissions go beyond our ability to see, hear or feel them -are very real to the human body and cells, which they pass right through. As a result cells can get frequency affected, confused, damaged, mutated or shut down (killed) over time.


I am paraphrasing this note to you, as a wellness advocate and as a layperson. If you require current referenced scientific papers, please let me know and I will forward them to you. At this time, I am assuming that you will be presented with papers from the formal petitioner's contributions to you.


It is my experience and opinion after 20 years as a wellness advocate that leading non-industry scientists and doctors (who are now petitioning all over the world) need to be listened to. Leading non-industry scientists and doctors who are on the front line and unpaid by industry, must be equally relied upon (along side of industry and governments) for up-to-date emission and emitter tower placements and safety standards. 


During rapid technological growth government standards become obsolete too quickly to be inappropriately carved into (Health Canada) stone for too long. These levels based on data that quickly becomes "old", provide inadequate protection. Injury feedback of the real effects in the public are fast growing as are new techno-emission developments and placements. The invisible  emissions are now in most cases, emitting 24/7 in public "airways"; within buildings and from towers on public buildings, even schools. Invisible frequencies are easy to ignore. Emissions are vibrations that are invisible -but proven to be damaging and even lethal at the wrong frequency or prolonged exposure levels, or as a result of long-term or intense or multiple bombardments.


It is my opinion those who "test" for safety, often behind-closed-door, compartmentalized Industrialists and lab-or-specific-field-environment scientists (those who set standards for all people) are often not "whole visioned" enough. Nor do they respond well or take into account adequately the longer-term cumulative injury feedback as readily from the public, from independent scientists and from doctors who are treating new techno-caused cell damage or death.


Government officials who regulate industry frequently job-switch and often get lost in slow-turning processes with little follow-ups on safety and public effects processes, once they set a health or safety standard in place. "Off the record" some admit, that they honestly, openly and ethically -need help, to protect and prevent techno-injuries over the long run to the people, children and babies, whom they wish to protect. Those who think freely, know that new techno-emissions-human cell injuries and emissions related deaths -are astonishingly on the rise. This is  most especially occurring in mothers -invetro babies whose cells are differentiating at high rates; in children with cells rapidly dividing and adults (often technology workers and police and military personnel with attached technology as part of uniform) who are frequency bombarded 24/7, causing their cells and cell processes to be excited, confused, stunned or involved in early cell death.  Natural gas is invisible and it has added to it, for safety, an odor. Techno-emissions and emission towers which are vibrating into our cells, have no such discernable safety alarm.


The only thing more obsolete or non-existent in Canada and the US than current adequate emissions safety standards and the policing of those standards are adequate laws to ethically guided techno-corporations. Old industrial-corporate laws in Canada are currently being used to guide technologic corporations. They are wholly inadequate to protect the population given the new technologies and their all-pervasive and unique airway "pollutions" which are persistent 24/7.

As you may know, corporate law in Canada and the US, currently supports, the unbridled expansion and growth of corporations with few restrictions, except for gross negligence. The law supports corporate profit and ease of operations for corporations and their productions, as paramount. This has been so, since the industrial revolution -and for the last 100 years. In the old days, 100 years ago when these laws were being formed for corporations, judges were of the opinion that the wide-open earth was big enough to allow any physical damage to nature or to humans to likely be minimal as compared to social good. Pollutions of airways, waterways, soil and harms to some humans were allowed to "lay". There were few corporate responsibilities and almost none to require clean-up or to prevent damage to, -or to protect people from, short-term or long-term harm. The greater (perceived) social good to humanity from the products and services corporations were producing, moving us away from the horse-and-buggy era to the modern, vehicles and furnaces for every home era, were seen as worthy of forgiving the extreme harms that may have been done to the wide-open environment. Diseases and ails to humanity, that the corporations chemical emissions and by-products may have been caused by dumping and airborne emissions of chemicals were left to the doctor's and to the consumer and their family budget, to take care of.  


Emissions of the vibratory-frequency type, emitted 24/7 from wireless emitter towers and wired technologies are a greater threat to unconsenting people, than the last 100 industrial years of corporate chemical smog which you could at least avoid because you could see it in the airways waterway pollutions. These new emission can't be avoided, they are invisible. You can't smell and see them and then choose to leave the area. The harms or death's caused by techno- emissions are more stealthy. It is almost impossible for the average person to prove gross, extreme or any negligence from a corporation.


In the last 10 years anti-depressant prescriptions in England, the US and Canada are at 31 million, 118 million and 19 million respectively. If things are getting better socially, we must ask why have prescriptions tripled and quadrupled, during the rise of techno-frequency emissions in the airways and buildings? The effects of these emission must be looked at with more precaution and care.  We as Canadians are trying to undo the damage of chemically polluted water-ways and air-ways conditions caused by free corporation. While we are all trying to clean up (or recover we see in the last century more and more medical disorders grow and expensive medical dependencies on pharmaceuticals, surgeries, medical implant devices and organ transplants required. Our once well-meaning but now innocently, out-of-control, billion-dollar, profitable power and emissions-corporations need our help. They need our help to prevent further escalating crippling costs to government health programs from more emissions related disorders and injuries caused by inadequate safety emissions levels standards and multiple and poorly placed emitter towers in Canada. Perceived social good of corporate techno-industries is now out-of-balance with the realities of human need and safety today. 


Corporate law in Canada and the US is obsolete. Health Canada "industry" are quickly out of date and cannot be set in stone. These standards do not currently protect people, children and babies whose cells are radiated more and more with inadequately safe 24/7 multiple wire-less techno-frequencies in their homes, buildings and airways. -Independent doctors and non-industry scientist with no financial interests must be relied on to create adequate ongoing and updated Canadian safety standards. 



We are not learning from Europe’s mistakes and injuries it seems. However, as you are receiving more and more petitions from Canadians now, please listen to the non-industry doctors and scientists equally to industry and governors. Let non-industry doctors and scientists work together to help Canadians find the right levels and placements of emissions. As new data arrives please insist that teams work together to update Canada's health and safety emissions standards. Make Canada's homes, schools, publicly-used emission techno-wireless products; public buildings and airways an example for the world during this technological era, in keeping with Canada's highest degree of wise, preventative safety.


Thank you for receiving opinion and input.



Marilyn Idle L.L.B.

Counsellor, Mediator

Wellness Advocate




The following information FYI is from the website. Dr Mercola is a Naturopath and Medical Doctor.


Are Cell Phones More Dangerous Than Smoking?

cell phone, mobile phoneAward-winning cancer expert Dr. Vini Khurana [see orginal 69 page document at] has concluded that mobile phones may kill far more people than smoking or asbestos. The latest study, which is being called the “most devastating indictment yet” for the safety of mobile phones, draws on growing evidence that using handsets for 10 years or more can double your risk of brain cancer.

Professor Khurana reviewed more than 100 studies on the effects of mobile phones, and concluded that "there is a significant and increasing body of evidence for a link between mobile phone usage and certain brain tumors."

"We are currently experiencing a reactively unchecked and dangerous situation," he added.

Earlier this year, the French government warned against the use of mobile phones, particularly for children. Germany also advises people to minimize handset use.

Khurana urges people to avoid using mobile phones whenever possible, and believes that governments and the mobile phone industry must take immediate steps to reduce exposure to this radiation.

If nothing is done, Khurana believes the rate of malignant brain tumors and the associated death rate will rise around the world within a decade, and by then it may be too late to intervene medically.


Dr. Mercola

Dr. Mercola's Comments:

You may think this headline sounds like a bit of a stretch, or perhaps even a major stretch. Well, I urge you to think again, as this headline, and the research behind it, is spot on.

Professor Khurana based the notion that cell phones are more dangerous than smoking on the following logic: 3 billion people use cell phones worldwide, which is three times more than the amount of people who smoke.

Of course, smoking doesn’t immediately show any deadly signs either. But wait a decade or so, and the evidence is there right before your eyes. According to Khurana, the "incubation time" or "latency" (the time from the start of regular mobile phone usage to the diagnosis of a malignant solid brain tumor) is around 10-20 years. In the years 2008-2012, he says, “we will have reached the appropriate length of follow-up time to begin to definitively observe the impact of this global technology on brain tumor incidence rates.”

There is VERY solid evidence that the number of brain tumors will increase to 500,000 per YEAR in 2010 -- and this will double to 1 million every year by 2015 if the causes are not addressed.

Folks, this is the real deal and represents an impending health care crisis.

Cell Phones Appear to be a MAJOR Health Risk

I am absolutely convinced that the explosion of cell phone usage around the world is a major contributor to a host of diseases ranging from autism to cancer to insomnia.

I am in the final editing phases of my next book, which is dedicated to this very topic and will be released in the spring or summer of 2009, or possibly sooner.

You are fortunate, though, as you are receiving this information today, while there is still time to circumvent some of the damage. Please do not wait another 10 years for the “definitive” link to be found and publicized in the mainstream circles before you take action to protect yourself, and your children, from the electromagnetic radiation and information-carrying radio waves emitted by cell phones and many other wireless devices.

If you’re looking for some type of indication that cell phones are causing you harm, consider that all of the following ailments have been scientifically linked to information-carrying radio waves:

Meanwhile, here is a sample of what Professor Khurana found after reviewing over 100 studies:

  • Electromagnetic radiation such as that emitted by mobile and cordless phones can heat the side of your head or pulse it non-thermally, and potentially thermoelectrically interact with the organic electrical currents of your brain.

  • Bluetooth devices and unshielded headsets can convert your head into an effective, potentially self-harming antenna.

  • Exposure is long-term and its effects on your body, particularly its electrical organ, your brain, are compounded by numerous other simultaneous long-term exposures including continuous waves from radio and TV transmitter towers, cordless phone base stations, power lines, and wireless/WiFi computing devices.

Do You STILL Believe That Cell Phones are Safe?

Well, if you’re finding it hard to believe that a widely used technology such as cell phones and wireless technologies could be causing you harm, it may help to compare it to other “technologies” that were once widely accepted:

  • The shoe-fitting fluoroscope, an X-ray machine used to look at the bones of your foot in order to judge your shoe size.

  • Radioactive drinking water, toothpaste, hair tonic and candy.

  • “Soothing syrup” for children that contained morphine, chloroform, codeine, heroin, opium and cannabis.

  • Mercury, the highly toxic metal, used to treat everything from cuts to constipation.

  • Heroin, which was originally developed and sold as a cough suppressant.

Even cigarette smoking was once described as healthy!

Cell Phones are Just One Part of the Problem

Information-carrying radio waves are all around us -- especially from cell phones, but also from WiFi, WiMax, BlueTooth, and other wireless devices. And you are likely receiving exposure to them 24/7.

It’s important to understand that the danger from most land-based portable phones, cell phones and WiFi routers is NOT from the microwave carrier wave, for which typical SAR ratings are given on phones.

This SAR rating indicates the thermal effect emitted by your phone, which is totally insignificant, unless you have massive exposures like you might expect in a microwave oven. This is why the discussion about lowering the allowable SAR is pointless, as it will NOT make cell phones safer.

Instead, nearly all your biological damage comes from the modulated signals that are carried ON the carrier microwave.

These modulated information-carrying radio waves resonate (vibrate) in the same frequencies as many of your cellular receptors; frequencies of a few to a few hundred cycles per second. These are biological frequencies and, unlike ionizing radiation (X-rays), which you can tolerate in small doses, there is NO dose of these radio waves that are safe. They cause damage at ANY dose, no matter how low.

This concept is called zero threshold, and that is precisely what you have with cell phones, most portable phones, and WiFi routers.

These information-carrying radio waves can stimulate or confuse your cellular receptors, causing a whole cascade of pathological consequences that can culminate in fatigue, sleeplessness, anxiety, neurological decline, and ultimately cancers.

The reason why children should NOT use cell phones is because they have developing nervous systems and thinner skulls than adults, making them especially vulnerable to this type of damage.

Can Cell Phones be Used Safely?

In the best-case scenario, you would turn off your cell phone, put it in the glove compartment of your car or in a briefcase, and only use it in emergencies. Obviously, many of you have come to rely on your cell phone for much more than this, but remember it wasn’t long ago that we all got along fine without them -- and it’s not too late to go back to that point.

Remember, kids should NOT be using cell phones. As a parent, it’s up to you to protect them from this avoidable risk.

Assuming you do choose to use a cell phone for more than just emergences, here are the tips to increase your safety level (for cell phones and other radio-wave exposures):

  • Limit the amount of time you spend on a cell phone or cordless phone.

  • Use a wired headset to limit your exposure to the cell phone -- ideally, an air tube headset that conducts sound but prevents any radiation from traveling up the wire to your brain. Also, make sure the wire is SHIELDED, which prevents it from acting as an antenna that could attract more information-carrying radio waves directly to your brain. Wireless BlueTooth headsets should be avoided.

  • Limit your exposure to WiFi routers. Find out where they are located in your work environment and stay away from them.

  • If you have any land-based (non-cellular) portable phones, do NOT use anything other than the 900 MHz phones, as the Gigahertz phones stay on continuously, blasting you with information-carrying radio waves 24/7.

  • Use the speakerphone instead of putting the phone to your ear; this is probably one of the single most important steps you can take other than not using your cell phone.

  • Limit calls inside buildings.

  • Use your cell phone only where the reception is good. When the reception is poor, your phone has to work harder, and therefore emits a much stronger radiation signal.